<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on Criminal Justice Reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danmalloy.wordpress.com/2007/11/27/thoughts-on-criminal-justice-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danmalloy.wordpress.com/2007/11/27/thoughts-on-criminal-justice-reform/</link>
	<description>DanMalloy.com is a political forum for discussing progressive solutions for Connecticut's future.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:07:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://danmalloy.wordpress.com/2007/11/27/thoughts-on-criminal-justice-reform/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danmalloy.wordpress.com/2007/11/27/thoughts-on-criminal-justice-reform/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Dear Senator Mcdonald,

I often find your sarcastic enuendos obnoxious.  I find it ironic that you seem to be annoyed that media attention and the public are driving the debate on tougher laws with respect to 3 strike offenders and such.  I find it ironic because you and Michael Lawlor followed this exact game plan with respect to the so called &quot; judicial scandle&quot; you along with the Hartford Courant created.  Without your use of the media there would have been a different outcome.  But you were atleast smart enough to manipulate the citizens of connecticut through the hartford courant and derail everything you did not want.  You now find your self in a postion of the minority and probably will say or do anything to reject every proposal you don&#039;t agree with.  The only problem is now the Courant is also calling for tougher laws and you probably can&#039;t manipulate the situation like you and Rep Lawlor did with respect to the judical branch.  Hopefully people beging to see through all the lies and realize you have an agenda that just does not coorolate to most of the citizens of connecticut.  We will never move forward with your leadership.   I think what you are saying is Governor Rell is not sincere when you refer to her &quot; newfoud interest&quot;.  I can tell you that if the Governor said we need to look at what good for Connecticut and we should move toward more social programs and release inmates to lower prision overcrowding that would be just fine with you.  I do think you manipulated the Governor durning the so called Judicial Scandel you created but I think the governor see right through your agend on tougher laws.  Thank God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Senator Mcdonald,</p>
<p>I often find your sarcastic enuendos obnoxious.  I find it ironic that you seem to be annoyed that media attention and the public are driving the debate on tougher laws with respect to 3 strike offenders and such.  I find it ironic because you and Michael Lawlor followed this exact game plan with respect to the so called &#8221; judicial scandle&#8221; you along with the Hartford Courant created.  Without your use of the media there would have been a different outcome.  But you were atleast smart enough to manipulate the citizens of connecticut through the hartford courant and derail everything you did not want.  You now find your self in a postion of the minority and probably will say or do anything to reject every proposal you don&#8217;t agree with.  The only problem is now the Courant is also calling for tougher laws and you probably can&#8217;t manipulate the situation like you and Rep Lawlor did with respect to the judical branch.  Hopefully people beging to see through all the lies and realize you have an agenda that just does not coorolate to most of the citizens of connecticut.  We will never move forward with your leadership.   I think what you are saying is Governor Rell is not sincere when you refer to her &#8221; newfoud interest&#8221;.  I can tell you that if the Governor said we need to look at what good for Connecticut and we should move toward more social programs and release inmates to lower prision overcrowding that would be just fine with you.  I do think you manipulated the Governor durning the so called Judicial Scandel you created but I think the governor see right through your agend on tougher laws.  Thank God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on criminal justice reform &#124; a public defender</title>
		<link>http://danmalloy.wordpress.com/2007/11/27/thoughts-on-criminal-justice-reform/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on criminal justice reform &#124; a public defender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danmalloy.wordpress.com/2007/11/27/thoughts-on-criminal-justice-reform/#comment-34</guid>
		<description>[...] For other people&#8217;s takes on this, read CTLP&#8217;s posts here and here, the Connecticut Post has a story here, the Norwalk Advocate has one here, something from The Day here and the Courant&#8217;s coverage is here. PDF files of all the testimony submitted to the Committee are here and Senator McDonald offered his thoughts here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For other people&#8217;s takes on this, read CTLP&#8217;s posts here and here, the Connecticut Post has a story here, the Norwalk Advocate has one here, something from The Day here and the Courant&#8217;s coverage is here. PDF files of all the testimony submitted to the Committee are here and Senator McDonald offered his thoughts here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
