By ARIELLE REICH
It was announced this week that House Speaker Jim Amann is establishing a 12-person task force to study the root causes of, and possible legislative solutions to, fatherless families in Connecticut.
From the Connecticut Post:
Amann says he’s concerned that children growing up in homes without fathers face tougher odds, such as greater likelihood of criminal involvement.
In press statements, members of this task force went on to blame poverty, teen pregnancy, child abuse, drug and alcohol abuse, and even health and education problems, on not having a father in the home. All these issues are complex, with multiple root causes, and demand creative problem solving. It seems counterproductive to assume that the commitment of time and resources to a vague study of “fatherlessness,” will produce any concrete solutions. Oversimplification rarely does.
This task force certainly seems well intentioned. I don’t blame the legislators for taking a stance and fighting for the welfare of Connecticut families and children, but I think this task force misses the point.
“Fatherlessness” alone is a rather poor predictor of future success in any venue. One only has to look at children of fatherless households that have grown into the most successful and prominent adults in our society. Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and even our own Jim Himes were all raised predominantly by single mothers, and there are thriving children all over the country who are being raised in cohesive, strong, and loving families that have two parents of the same gender.
Also, according to the statement of Rep. Ken Green, the “task force will even look to see if the financial burden of the state’s attempt to collect child support from fathers is limiting the involvement of the father in a child’s life.” The collection of child support from absent parents is probably the one most direct method of assistance to so many single families, and has the most immediate positive impact. The task force should steer clear of tinkering with a legislative program that obviously works well. Otherwise, they run the risk of undermining the same parental responsibility that they say they want to promote.
The effort to cure the ills of society with legislative solutions may be laudable, but perhaps our limited resources should be focused on issues that have proven to have a more direct impact on the welfare and betterment of Connecticut families. After all, it seems impossible to cure “the epidemic of fatherlessness” but we can focus on solutions that have a proven track record of success, such as strengthening our education system and building strong and cohesive community centers that support the family structure, whatever it may be.


Recent Comments